After all, there are many factors that play into how easy it is to get around a city, from the reliability of public transport to the accessibility of docked bikes. Our Urban Mobility Index, which analyzes how 38 cities across the world move, provides answers by assessing each metropolis on how it fares in terms of connectivity, sustainability, affordability, and innovation. And through this data, we can better understand how mobility solutions keep urban areas livable and productive.
The value of the Urban Mobility Index isn’t just in finding out whose trains are faster or who’s paying more for fuel. Transport is just as much about physical mobility as it is about economic mobility, because as we’ve explored previously, the ability to get around is key to employment, productivity, and wellbeing.
Zürich ranks number one when it comes to public transport efficiency, leading the world with the frequency of its trains, trams, and buses. The speed of its services is also notable, being among the top 10 cities when comparing average journey times to comparable trips via car.
What's the impact of a city with such broad public transport coverage? For one thing: Equity. Multiple studies in the last decade have shown that access to transportation and poverty are connected. The poorer the access to public transit, the higher likelihood that an area's residents are unemployed or are in a low income bracket. In that light, Zurich's 81% public transport city coverage, at a monthly cost of 1.63% of the average income, is way ahead of the curve when it comes to bringing public transit to all city-dwellers' doors.
Helsinki, on the other hand, is a paradise for road users, recording less congestion than every other city studied – not even two percent of its roads become congested during peak hours. And when residents do get stuck in traffic, they can expect a delay of just 16 minutes per 100 kilometers, which is second only to Madrid.
Speaking of Madrid, the Spanish capital leads the other cities with its volume of green space. Not only do these areas improve air quality, they provide residents with more active ways of getting around, such as walking and cycling.
While 44% of Madrid is green space, the city has zero low emission zones. By comparison, London, Brussels, Vienna and Mexico City are 100% low emission zones. A long-running environmental program in Mexico aims to reduce pollution by placing restrictions on when certain vehicles can drive, and while the improvements may be limited so far, the local government is pushing to make the city even greener.
When it comes to the price of using public transport, it doesn’t get much cheaper than in Mumbai, where a month’s worth of travel costs less than one percent of the average net monthly income. Similarly, US cities have the cheapest fuel relative to income, led by San Francisco. However, it’s worth noting that both of Mumbai and San Francisco lag in terms of public transport density and road congestion.
Some of the biggest shifts to urban mobility are being seen in Europe. Amsterdam, for instance, has over 1,600 electric vehicle charging stations per one million people, helping to make fossil fuel-free driving a reality. Paris leads the EU in density of charging stations per million people. Copenhagen’s entire metro rail network has been automated, meanwhile Brussels has 4.17 docked bikes per 1,000 people, beating out every other city.
In short, urban mobility matters. Whether moving by car, bike, or public transport, the future well-being of our cities will be indelibly linked to providing affordable, sustainable means for everyone to get where they're going each day.
Cross country reports like the Urban Mobility Index give governments and decision makers better knowledge of how people are navigating cities, what challenges they’re facing, and where there’s a need to innovate and adapt. Through this data, we can help make cities around the world not only more mobile, but also more livable. Learn more about building the next generation of mobility solutions.
Why sign up: